POLITICS: Oh my God!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If someone had told me a decade ago that my politics would be this ...

My Political Views
I am a left moderate social libertarian
Left: 3.61, Libertarian: 2

Political Spectrum Quiz


... there's a possibility I would have shot them and/or myself.

Or perhaps I never was as conservative as I thought. Was I always a feel-good liberal hippy only interested in sowing the seeds of love?



Was I really only ever selectively conservative. Perhaps it's time to start writing the political sequel to this ...



UPDATE I: One of my admirers sent in this balanced comment for moderation:

The women of the world want you to kill yourself so that there is absolutely no danger of any of the sisterhood being sexually abused by you anymore. The test-tube scientists of the world want you to kill yourself so that there is no danger of your flawed genetic material being passed onto some new life form. Irfan it is well known that any opinion you might temporarily hold is purely the result of your own delusions and the varying effects of psychiatric pharmaceuticals. Existing as the most grotesque fat black freak in Australia does not entitle you to have a political opinion. Australian humans are entitled to any political opinion. You are not.

Thank you, Douglas Darby!

UPDATE II: Another message for moderation.

It's sad that your political views mirror your life situation as a nasty little social outcast, vicious gossip and a dependent needy lonely screw-up. It's not too late to give yourself an abortion with a massive overdose of psychiatric medication and an attention-seeking self-immolation. Your self-hatred and dislike of all humanity is the reason you continue to torture yourself and all Australians by continuing to exist. You are not going to get any happier by eating yourself to death so just have some dignity for the first time in your sad and lonely life and end it.

I love you too, Doug.

Bookmark this on Delicious

MEDIA: Excerpts from pro-Action

Just over a decade ago, I started producing a conservative youth rag called pro-Action. The name was designed to steal the thunder of the official NSW Young Liberal rag which was called Action. The following is the first half of an article published in edition 2 of pro-Action, published at some time in 1996 ...

Pauline Hanson

… how should “ethnic” australians respond?

In her maiden speech, the Member for Oxley made remarks which appeared to offend persons of Asian and Aboriginal extraction. Ethnic community leaders have expressed outrage and righteous indignation at her comments. Meanwhile, the press and media are almost suggesting that Ms Hanson speaks for a silent undercurrent of “mainstream Australia” (whatever that means).

Personally, I find Ms Hanson somewhat of a non-entity. She really doesn’t deserve the attention she is receiving. Her views are ill-informed and simply do not accord with present economic, social and political realities.

But I don’t think that political correctness and labelling is going to be sufficient to deal with the points she has raised in her maiden speech. In this regard, I don’t believe certain ethnic community “leaders” have done great service to their communities by their reactions to Ms Hanson.

What all Australians should understand is that there is a genuine constituency for the sorts of views which Messrs [Graeme] Campbell [former Federal Member for Kalgoolie] and Hanson espouse. This is a fact we have to accept. We also have to accept and expect that this constituency will want to be represented in Parliament. Australians of all persuasions deserve to find representation in our national parliament.

Naturally, we would like to keep this constituency as small as possible. And yet by getting so uptight over Ms Hanson and by attacking her personally, some ethnic “leaders” are actually generating sympathy for Ms Hanson. In doing so, they are actually increasing the size of her constituency and the number of her supporters.

Politically correct labelling is simply not going to work anymore. Australians are tired of the labelling of controversial individuals by their opponents. Most of us watched quite dazed and perturbed at the vicious treatment received by Helen Darville (though I was amused when a Ukranian organisation threatened Darville critics with action under racial vilification legislation). Desperate and immature labelling is simply not going to gain sympathy for anyone other than the person labelled.

What supporters of immigration and multiculturalism need to do is to tell the community the facts about immigration. We need to explain to Australians the economic and social benefits of our large migration program. We need to remind Australians that the only other nation to accept migrants with as open arms as us is now the most powerful and wealthy nation on earth (“give me your tired, your weary …")

[Clearly I’d never heard of Canada or Brazil in 1996.]

To be continued …

Words © 2008 Irfan Yusuf

Bookmark this on Delicious

EVENT: Learning liberty ...

OK, I admit I bag the Centre for Independent Studies from time to time. But one excellent initiative they put on is the Liberty & Society conference, a weekend program in which they invite young students and professionals to learn about classical and neo-classical liberalism.

I attended one of these conferences some years back, and I still have the notes. You may not agree with the CIS's take on everything, but this course really gives you something to think about.

More importantly, you get to meet some awesome intellects. I remember meeting these 2 rather funky individuals named Suri Ratnapala and the distinguished political scientist Chandran Kukathas (whose paper on multiculturalism should be required reading for anyone with an interest on the subject). One of these guys apparently got away with being the only dude to teach women's studies at an Australian university. Quite an achievement!

I strongly recommend this course to anyone who wishes to learn more about liberty.

© Irfan Yusuf 2007


Bookmark this on Delicious