Showing posts with label magazines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label magazines. Show all posts

Monday, May 25, 2009

BLOGS/CRIKEY: Sydney Writers' Festival does blogging ...



To blog or not to blog? That was just one of the questions posed by moderator Rachel Hills to a panel of bloggers, journalists and one burnt-out ex-journalist at a Sydney Writers' Festival gig on Sunday.

The panel consisted of former Sydney Morning Herald scribe and Webdiary founder Margo Kingston, blogger and author Anthony Loewenstein, blogger and tabloid opinion editor Tim Blair and blogger and former editor of Girlfriend magazine Erica Bartle. Their task was to test the following proposition:

If bloggers are all wannabe journalists and journalists are all complacent hacks, why do so few manage to cross over?

The discussion was fairly free-flowing and surprisingly civil, given what one participant has written about two of the others. I'll summarise in "first person" what each speaker said at various points.

Kingston: Paul McGeogh kinda pushed me into citizen journalism via what was once the Herald's Webdiary, and I'm not sure whether to thank or sue him. The interaction with readers was the best thing that happened to me in journalism. Webdiary contributors included concerned expats and rural readers. Journos often put on a persona of detachment because they don't want their own personal failings exposed whilst quite happy to expose the same failings in others. Many future blog-related jobs will be about moderating comments, and those employed have a high burnout rate. Currently sub-editors do this.

Loewenstein: Why can't journalists also be advocates? Many effectively advocate despite the veneer of objectivity. Studies have shown that the vast majority of media stories are generated from one source or press release. Journos rarely talk to real people, content to talk to each other. In many non-Western countries, bloggers are the only source of non-state information and take enormous risks, many jailed and tortured.

Bartle: There are no rules in blogging, unlike journalism. Blogs provide a superficial readership experience. I rarely spend an hour online reading a feature article. So much womens magazine journalism is just googling or desktop journalism, with not enough going out into the "fashion trenches". Rarely do magazine writers speak to people beyond fixed contact lists. Journalist hopefuls should be careful with what they put online as potential employers may not like what you write even if it's well-written.

Blair: I started blogging after a long career in journalism for Time Magazine and the Daily Telegraph. I'm somewhat lazy and the short form of blogging suited me. When you write a blog post, you can't help but tell something about yourself (perhaps something like this?). Blog journalists are surprisingly thin-skinned. I encourage young upcoming journos to blog. It's like an online CV. In these recessionary times, blogging can lead to employment. The Daily Telegraph doesn't have paid comment moderators (Yep, we can tell).

And what did the chairperson have to say? My notes show Rachel Hills saying she only found a few bloggers in mainstream media interesting enough to visit.

First published in Crikey on 25 May 2009.

UPDATE I: A regular commenter on Tim Blair's bog recently commented on the SWF discussion here. Tim leaves his own comment. Readers can draw their own conclusions.

Sunday, October 05, 2008

MEDIA: Australia/NZ edition of the Spectator hits the stands ...

I'd now like to present an explanation of why not all English spectators are ugly violent hooligans.

The last few years has been a terribly sad time for small-'c' conservatives looking for sensible reading material. Quadrant has become the official rag for the Queen Isabella Appreciation Society. Policy is almost like Valium in glossy paper form. The Opinion page of The Australian becomes nuttier and nuttier with almost each passing day, a broadsheet version of Fox News. Conservative blogs spend more time commenting on people's physique than on real issues. Were it not for the IPA Review, sensible conservatives would have no option but to keep investing $18 each week on the Fin Review and/or move to the UK and buy the Spectator without paing extra for postage.

So much of what passes for conservative commentary has become bigotted monocultural nonsense that makes more sense when you take it into the toilet and wipe it on your backside a few times with the remains of your number 2. Haven't these chaps realised that John Howard lost both the last federal election and his own seat for a reason?

(Well, actually, for numerous reasons.)

And don't they understand why having Dr Brendan "I've never voted Liberal in my life! (that is, until I first ran as Liberal candidate for Bradfield)" Nelson as Opposition Leader was a disaster precisely because he was too busy trying to out-Howard Mr Howard?

Now sensible small-'c' conservatives have a chance of making its mark. We no longer need feel embarrassed by monocultural morons busy re-writing sectarian conspiracy theories whilst defending their own links to religious fringe-dwellers (like the Exclusive Brethren, Catch The Fire Ministries, the Lebanese al-Ahbash cult or a certain Saudi fundraiser from Auburn) that make ordinary believers cringe.

We need not be ashamed to see far-Right pseudo-conservatives defending the most indefensible abuses of human rights such as locking up children for years in concentra ... woops ... detention centres in the desert until they become severely depressed near-mutes.

Let's hope that the ascendancy of Malcolm Turnbull will enable small-l liberals and small-c conservatives to reclaim the centre of the Australian political spectrum. And let's hope that the entry of an Australia/NZ edition of the often-magnificent Spectator magazine will be the beginning of this process.

Anway, now that I've gotten that long intro out of the way, let me congratulate the Spectator for extending its arm to a couple of waward colonies. Admittedly, the mag is a little eccentric at times. It also has little hesitation in bagging conservatives when it thinks they are losing the plot.
And it does engage some writers who have well and truly lost the plot. But it is always an entertaining and interesting read. Heck, if I was convinced Tim Blair knew how to read and/or write, I'd even recommend he'd subscribe.

Words © 2008 Irfan Yusuf

Delicious
Bookmark this on Delicious

Digg!



Get Flocked